Filed under: review

Coffeecatcher Mesh Filter Review

In the increasingly popular world of filter brew coffee, there are two main types of filters - paper and steel. Paper filters have been around for as long as you or I have probably been alive. Heck, my parents-in-law used them back in the 60s! Granted, they have improved since then, but i'd often wondered just how good the new breed of stainless steel filters was. Could they eliminate paper filter taste, were they really re-usable and designed to last, and would they taste as good, or better than coffee brewed using a throw-away paper filter?  After acquiring the fancy new Coffeecatcher mesh filter from Wine of the Bean (which sells in their web store for a paltry $30, compared to about twice that much for competing stainless steel filter brands) I set about testing the device to see if it really did all that it promised.

First up, let's take a real close look at the Coffeecatcher mesh filter from Wine of the Bean, using our magical macro vision digitally enhanced technology!

Examining the Coffeecatcher mesh filter

Inside:

Img_1903
Outside:

Coffee_mesh
You can see in these shots the construction of the dual-layered mesh. It is stiched together using sterling silver thread, is held together nicely and the quality was excellent. It feels strong and the seams are all nice and even.


Testing the Coffeecatcher mesh filter

I decided to test the coffeecatcher using my chemex, the reason being the chemex is clear glass whereas my clever dripper or v60 brewer are not see through. The chemex will give us a nice view of the mesh filter as we brew, and fitted quite nicely into the small 3-cup chemex despite being sized for the wider mouth of the v60.

Img_1904
For this test i've roasted some lovely Kenya 'Mtaro' peaberry and Guatemala 'San Francisco' beans to a filter roast depth, with first crack at 10:00 at 195 degrees, dumped at 12:00 at 201 degrees. 

The coffee - Kenya Mtaro peaberry + Guatemala San Francisco

In terms of grind, i found a medium filter grind setting similar to what you would use with paper filters works well. Since the coffeecatcher is designed to mimic the flow rate of paper filters, you don't need to use a different grind setting. As usual, just adjust grind according to taste and flow rate.

Filter coffee dose

Img_1907
Img_1908
In terms of dose, i normally use about 7.5g of coffee for every 100g of water. For this pour i was aiming for 230g of coffee (about an 8oz cup) so i dosed 17g of coffee. I've found in the past that 17g of coffee for 230g of water has always worked well when working with a v60 or other filter brew device of similar size.

Filter coffee pour

Img_1911
Don't forget to reset your scales at this point to zero. Your brewer should already be pre-heated using boiling water. Now we're ready to pour. I always do a wetting/pre-infuse stage of about 25 seconds before beginning the pour. I fill, let the bed sink then fill again. Some people like to keep the bed lower, some take it higher. I find the amount of agitation is what affects the brew more than just the number of pours used or the height of the bed. Coffee is soluable and we are using water as a solvent so like any science experiment the agitation plays a big factor in how much coffee ends up in the water below your filter.

(download)

Now we have our 230g of filter brew. Let's take a look at the final bed of coffee.

Img_1922
It looks just as you'd expect, and it performed just like any good paper filter would. Excellent!  After a quick rinse in hot water, the filter looks clean and hasn't collected any fines. I was worried a dual layer mesh might not clean up easily but i've actually found it to be very quick and simple. No scrubbing or soaking required, just a quick rinse seems to do the job. Very impressed.

Img_1926
How did it taste?

Let me start by saying this. Obviously, there is no paper filter taste to contend with here so you're guaranteed that there won't be paper filter taint in the cup.But even above and beyond that, the resulting brew from the coffeecatcher filter actually surprised me by how sweet and flavourful it was.

I think i'll be reaching for the coffeecatcher mesh more often than my paper filters from now on.

Not that paper filters are necessarily bad, but I just think that this filter has outperformed others on so many levels. It doesn't need rinsing (except for pre-heat), it's easy to clean, it's affordable at $30, the pour rate mimics paper filters and the resulting brew, to my taste, was super delicious!

Img_1931
 

You can buy the coffeecatcher mesh filter over at the Wine of the Bean web store.

99 Point Coffee? - Bolivia Machacamarca de Berengula from HasBean

It's not often you hear of, or have the opportunity to taste a coffee which rates higher than 95 points. Much less one which is rated a whopping 99 points by a respected roaster/importer/expert in the specialty coffee industry.  Thanks to a stroke of luck in a spur of the moment giveaway on Twitter, @Hasbeanroaster was kind enough to send me a sample of the very special Bolivian coffee from the Machacamarca de Berengula farm.  This is a world farm exclusive coffee which to my understanding means that HasBean have sourced, imported and are probably the only ones distributing this coffee to a lucky few customers. 

The other Bolivian coffee i sourced recently is Cafe Familia Montano via Ministry Grounds. Interestingly the tasting notes for these two coffees are remarkably similar!

  • Grape acidity
  • Pronounced sweetness / super sweet
  • Caramel & toffee

Hmm, I wonder how the two will compare! I'm yet to roast any of the Montano, so the comparison will come later, but for now, let's look at the Machacamarca from Has Bean:

Img_1861
Roasted on the 1st of April, thanks to a slight hold up in Australian customs i've received it today, the 18th. Not ideal but definitely still fresh enough!  My wife and I will get through it in a couple days, i'm sure.

The roast depth and development on this coffee is absolutely beautiful. As an amateur roaster, i spent quite some time analysing the beans and just trying to imagine what kind of roast profile was used. It's a light espresso roast, about the same roast depth as i normally aim for - retaining all that varietal/origin character and yet it is not lacking in roast development or flavour.  Just how I like it.

Update: Roast time is approx 13 mins and drawn out from first to second crack.

Part of the reason i roast at home, is because i prefer a lighter roast than many cafes (but not all) offer when you buy their beans.  I think it's great to see Has Bean not afraid to use this kind of roast profile for high quality coffees like this one, which respond so well to a lighter roast.

Img_1863
How did it taste?

First up, as espresso I've tried it with a 19g dosed triple basket into 80mL of milk, and 170mL of milk (unhomogenised Maleny Dairy gold top). Then as a chemex.

(download)
I definitely agree with the tasting notes on this one. White grape acidity is a great descriptor, and the sweetness is extremely high and lasting. But at the same time, there is this clean, powerful body in perfect balance. The dry fragrance alone is quite astounding.

Img_1888

My own tasting descriptors would be similar:

  • Refined acidity in balance with a clean, powerful body
  • Extremely high, lingering sweetness not unlike a Kenyan but not quite as citrus or sharp but more of a refined acidity (probably helped along by the lighter roast)
  • Flavour reminded me of a melted caramel
  • The acidity is more like grape juice, not grapefruit

Is it worthy of 99 points? I would say it could very well be yes, simply because it's an extremely sweet coffee that is perfectly balanced and also has unique flavour attributes which i really enjoy. The beautiful roast depth and development on this one make it a 99 point coffee for me.

Huge thanks to Has Bean for sending this one down under, and for the awesome red HasBean towel!

For more info on this amazing coffee or to grab some for yourself check out the HasBean web site.

Img_1878
Img_1883

1 of 1
Posterous theme by Cory Watilo